#PHOTONINJA SEQ DOES NOT WORK PC#
#PHOTONINJA SEQ DOES NOT WORK ISO#

Not bad but looks like there's been some local contrast done to the PhotoNinja shot or is that from a default? Looks like PhotoNinja might end up being the benchmark raw converter for Xtrans. Looks good on my calibrated desktop screens. This is not the case on my calibrated desktop screens. Just a remark: While I read the post, I recognize that the image looks very (overly) saturated on my laptop screen. I think I used Portrait for that image, and added some Detail under 'Exposure and Detail'. Most often this is Portrait, other times it is Scenic. My first step with PhotoNinja is always to select the appropriate Preset. I don't have a Fuji RAW to base this on, just my experience with PN in general. That will make the colors richer and increase the contrast a little. If they look 'flat', try changing the color enhancement base style to 'Scenic'.

#PHOTONINJA SEQ DOES NOT WORK PC#

Though, I really wish for a PC version of ID, sigh. That's how I use the supplied version of SilkyPix, just to get a 'raw'. I just tried the beta for some on some of the RAW files from E-X1 and I'm getting very flat files.Īny suggestion on starting setting for PN?

#PHOTONINJA SEQ DOES NOT WORK ISO#

ISO are of course the same for both crops as thez are from the same raw file. I don't have the camera with me to tell for sure, but this is my normal nature shooting setup. The other JPG settings were Velvia, color -1, DR=Auto, highlights and shadows muted by 1, noise -2.

The EFIX data should be intact: ISO 800, 1/550s, Contax 90mm, I guess f5.6 or f8 Its also rather good in revealing any flaw in Fuji lens (there are some, but nothing tragic). and sh*tload of moiré under certain circumstances. I didn't realize they had expended be on Nooise reductionĬredits for demosaicing should be most likely to DCraw 9.19 with 3-pass demosaicing (which unless its multithreaded and optimised is really slow). Have they now expanded beyond notice: reduction? I've been using perfect photo 7.5 and with the right combination of texture booster and paint in detail brushes the results are pretty good Left side: PhotoNinja, Right side: Fuji jpg, already slightly sharpened.įuji is heavy-handed with noise reduction most people suggest turning it to -1 or -2 if shooting jpg to avoid over-smoothing. Highlight recovery is not yet implemented. The level of detail it exhibits is excellent while showing similarly nice colors as the Fuji jpg.

The most recent beta 1.2a of PhotoNinja now supports the Fuji X raw format.

Photoninja seq does not work